Every organization is pouring money into AI right now, and almost none of
them know what their people are actually doing with it': Study reveals employees are using their personal AI accounts at work, raising a whole host of issues

Date:
Tue, 26 May 2026 20:10:00 +0000

Description:
Shadow AI exposes company data and risks IP loss but personal tools offer easier access than clunky enterprise accounts.

FULL STORY ======================================================================Copy link Facebook X Whatsapp Reddit Pinterest Flipboard Threads Email Share this article 0 Join the conversation Follow us Add us as a preferred source on Google Newsletter Subscribe to our newsletter Two-thirds of AI use on
personal accounts is actually for work purposes Workers are also using company-provided tools to ask their personal questions Clunky enterprise authentication makes approved tools harder to access in an instant New research from Harmonic has claimed nearly two-thirds (64.5%) of all activity on personal and free AI accounts is actually for work purposes, meaning
theres a significant amount of AI use thats going totally undetected by companies.

At the same time, enterprise-grade accounts are being used for personal questions, meaning employees and AI are meeting wherever is convenient regardless of security policies. In fact, nearly half (45.6%) of all personal AI activity is happening on licensed plans that are being paid for by companies. In reality, workers arent treating work AI and personal AI as separate things, instead bringing their tasks to whichever AI tool is already open or easily accessible on their device, regardless of whether its employer-provided or personal, free or paid. Latest Videos From You may like Many firms don't know what their workers are sharing with AI tools Your employees are using AI, whether you like it or not - but are they using AI securely? Workers are increasingly using unapproved AI tools at work, despite knowing the risks Undetected work on personal AI is creating a visibility gap Harmonics research serves to highlight the visibility gap thats emerging as
AI adoption spreads, with legal and governance workers having both the
highest usage and highest visibility. These workers account for around one-fifth (19.5%) of all AI hours across teams, and 81% of this usage happens on approved tools.

Go-to-market teams are the second-highest users, at 17.5%, but only 39% of
GTM AI activity happens on company-approved tools, resulting in poor visibility. But thats still twice as much visibility as operations teams, where not even a fifth (18%) of activity runs on enterprise plans.

As for why AIs being used at work, the clearest purpose is efficiency and automation (47%), which ranks far ahead of decision support (20%) and risk
and compliance (20%). Revenue and growth (7%) and innovation (6%) are less common. The true measure of use is minutes, not queries Where Harmonics research differs from other studies is in its use of minutes rather than
total queries, which it argues offers a much truer reflection of usage patterns. Longer sessions indicate heavier data exposure, it says, and Claude comes out on top when it comes to actual minutes (10m 12s) compared with ChatGPT (5m 53s). Are you a pro? Subscribe to our newsletter Sign up to the TechRadar Pro newsletter to get all the top news, opinion, features and guidance your business needs to succeed! Contact me with news and offers from other Future brands Receive email from us on behalf of our trusted partners
or sponsors By submitting your information you agree to the Terms &
Conditions and Privacy Policy and are aged 16 or over.

This is especially problematic when workers choose to use their own personal AI accounts, because sensitive company information and business context remains in their personal AI history even when they leave a company. Organizations dont even have the legal or technical powers to wipe or recover that data, leading to permanent IP loss. The path of least resistance
Harmonic explained that many companies implement strict and clunky authentication processes for enterprise AI tools, making personal tools far easier to use. Popular personal tools like ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude and Perplexity also require little more than a Google account (or similar) to
sign in.

All of this while companies pay a premium for licenses that are barely
getting used Microsoft 365 Copilot is commonly deployed at $30 per user per month; ChatGPT Business plans come in at $20-25 per month.

Every organization is pouring money into AI right now, and almost none of
them know what their people are actually doing with it, Harmonic Security CEO Alastair Paterson summarized, noting that this is the first study of its type to uncover how AI is actually being used at work.

Clearly, the issue isnt necessarily with the provision of wrong tools, but rather ease of access. Looking ahead, companies are advised to adopt
universal single sign-on (SSO) to make logging in easier. But Harmonic still challenges the one size fits all approach, urging employers to consider workflows and give the right tools to the right teams. Follow TechRadar on Google News and add us as a preferred source to get our expert news, reviews, and opinion in your feeds.



======================================================================
Link to news story: https://www.techradar.com/pro/every-organization-is-pouring-money-into-ai-righ t-now-and-almost-none-of-them-know-what-their-people-are-actually-doing-with-i t-study-reveals-employees-are-using-their-personal-ai-accounts-at-work-raising -a-whole-host-of-issues


--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A49 (Linux/64)
* Origin: tqwNet Technology News (1337:1/100)