Which is your favorite? Dosbox-x or ntvdmx64? I am setting up another old desktop pc to run synchronet and am having problems getting ntvdmx64 to install correctly. I had no problem with the last two. I think defender is removing a critical .DLL during install. I know some sysops prefer dosbox x. I was curious about what you use.
Re: Dosbox-x or ntvdmx64
By: Rixter to All on Wed Aug 20 2025 09:11 pm
I use both for different reasons.
I've been using ntvdmx64 since I moved my BBS to Windows 10 64-bit last year, and have had mostly good results. All the doors I want to run, run just fine. There were a handful I couldn't run, like Betrayal of the Obsidian Baboon and a few others that I can't recall and frankly don't care about anyway.
The only reason I ever used (and still use) DOSBox-X is for Yankee Trader, since it's famously known for crashing. Emulating it lets allows it to run just fine crash-free.
|15 ¨ ¨ ¨ codefenix ¨ ¨ ¨ ConstructiveChaos BBS ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨
¨
|08 ¨ ¨ ¨ (https/telnet/ssh)://conchaos.synchro.net ¨ ¨ ¨
|07
---
¨ Synchronet ¨ -=[ ConstructiveChaos BBS | conchaos.synchro.net ]=-
Which is your favorite? Dosbox-x or ntvdmx64? I am setting up another old desktop pc to run synchronet and am having problems getting ntvdmx64 to install correctly. I had no problem with the last two. I think defender is removing a critical .DLL during install. I know some sysops prefer dosbox x. I was curious about what you use.
Rixter
telnet://ricksbbs.synchro.net:23
http://ricksbbs.synchro.net:8080
Sysop: | Sarah |
---|---|
Location: | Portland, Oregon |
Users: | 149 |
Nodes: | 16 (0 / 16) |
Uptime: | 72:05:42 |
Calls: | 1,029 |
Calls today: | 1,029 |
Files: | 84,959 |
U/L today: |
554 files (10,683M bytes) |
D/L today: |
3,359 files (8,411M bytes) |
Messages: | 65,516 |
Posted today: | 53 |