On 14/09/2024 19:32, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
[ 15.888471] brcmfmac: brcmf_cfg80211_set_power_mgmt: power save
enabled
You may find it is slightly more reliable with power saving disabled.
To disable temporarily use:-
sudo /sbin/iw dev wlan0 set power_save off
To make persistent create a file called /etc/udev/rules.d/71-wifi_power_save_off.rules containing the line:-
SUBSYSTEM=="net", ACTION=="add", DRIVERS=="brcmfmac", KERNEL=="wlan0", RUN="/sbin/iw dev wlan0 set power_save off"
---druck
On 17/09/2024 10:37, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
Anyway the final conclusions seem to be :
1. The ZERO 2W is hungrier for electrons than the old ZERO W.
2. The symptoms of starvation are evident first in the WiFi hardware.
The Zero W uses the same SOC as original Pi, and I ran that happily for
years on a 0.7A first generation Samsung Galaxy phone charger. When we
got the multicore Pi 2B it really needed a proper PSU rather than a
phone charger for reliability. The Zero 2W initially used the same SOC
as the 2B, then switched to the 3B's one when that was no longer available.
5. Whilst a chinesium USB source *may* be able to deliver the quoted
current, it is not necessarily able to deliver it in a noise free or
voltage-retaining fashion.
You can't go wrong with the official power supply, I've not had one fail
yet. I've used others when I needed a longer USB cables, and have had to replace some more than once.
Now I have achieved stability, the unit will go to a different
location to further development where it will naturally connect to the
original POS wifi point.
You might guess I recommend not scrimping on the access point either.
But I now have a microwave with a burnt out magnetron to fix...
Not related to the Z2W I hope!
Sysop: | Sarah |
---|---|
Location: | Portland, Oregon |
Users: | 148 |
Nodes: | 16 (0 / 16) |
Uptime: | 10:13:26 |
Calls: | 1,023 |
Calls today: | 1,023 |
Files: | 84,959 |
U/L today: |
554 files (10,683M bytes) |
D/L today: |
3,359 files (8,411M bytes) |
Messages: | 66,297 |
Posted today: | 53 |