League10 are both 10:*) and fastecho doesn't support that. IREX does, but

Use GEcho then.

... I am the neurosis that requires a $500-an-hour shrink!

--- Renegade v1.35à/DOS
* Origin: The Titantic BBS Telnet - ttb.rgbbs.info (1:129/305)

Re: Re: RA to SBBS QWK Networking?
By: T.J. Mcmillen to Martin Kazmaier on Sun Mar 10 2024 08:47 pm

I'll look at that, does it support multiple nets in the same zone?

Should if you set it up correctly.

I think it would need to support 5D addresses (with domains). I don't recall GEcho supporting 5D addresses.
--
digital man (rob)

Sling Blade quote #2:
Karl (re: killing Doyle): I hit him two good whacks in the head with it.
Norco, CA WX: 54.4øF, 54.0% humidity, 1 mph E wind, 0.00 inches rain/24hrs
--- SBBSecho 3.20-Linux
* Origin: Vertrauen - [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net (1:103/705)

No, but if I run gecho first, anything that isn't destined for it gets renamed from *.pkt to *.dst. I rename those to *.pkt, and let fastecho handle them afterwards. A bit dirty, but it works! I still can't get QWK networking working with SBBS. REP packets go out, but QWK won't come in.

Try FidoQWK ... it worked over here ... wasn't the best, but it worked. I think QWK is a stupid format for a message network instead of FTN and don't understand why ANYTHING is still run this way, but not my software. :)

... If you're trying to drive me crazy, you're too late.

--- Renegade v1.35à/DOS
* Origin: The Titantic BBS Telnet - ttb.rgbbs.info (1:129/305)

Is anyone doing this? I've tried MKNET and SUARM, both of which send REP packets successfully to SBBS, but neither of which can actually bring in QWK packets. Any RA users out there connecting to SBBS via QWK? I
can't use FTN for one of my networks because 2 networks use the same
zone (Araknet and League10 are both 10:*) and fastecho doesn't
support that. IREX does, but my mail tosser is just as important.

A bit of a repost... I had suggestions of what to use for FTN, but no answers from anyone using RA w/ QWK and SBBS. Anyone? I'm using QWK w/ SFNET since it's FTN support is pretty haphazard.

---
Shurato, Sysop Shurato's Heavenly Sphere (ssh, telnet, pop3, ftp,nntp)
(ports 22, 23, 110, 21, 119) (ssh: login bbs password shsbbs)


*** THE READER V4.50 [freeware]
---
* Origin: Shurato's Heavenly Sphere telnet://shsbbs.net (1:340/1101)

* In a message originally to Martin Kazmaier, T.J. Mcmillen said:

No, but if I run gecho first, anything that isn't destined for it gets renamed from *.pkt to *.dst. I rename those to *.pkt, and let

fastecho

handle them afterwards. A bit dirty, but it works! I still can't get

QWK

networking working with SBBS. REP packets go out, but QWK won't come

in.

Try FidoQWK ... it worked over here ... wasn't the best, but it worked. I

I looked at that, but couldn't figure out how to use it well enough.

---
Shurato, Sysop Shurato's Heavenly Sphere (ssh, telnet, pop3, ftp,nntp)
(ports 22, 23, 110, 21, 119) (ssh: login bbs password shsbbs)


---
* Origin: Shurato's Heavenly Sphere telnet://shsbbs.net (1:340/1101)

Re: Re: RA to SBBS QWK Networking?
By: T.J. Mcmillen to Martin Kazmaier on Wed Mar 13 2024 10:12 pm

Try FidoQWK ... it worked over here ... wasn't the best, but it worked. I think QWK is a stupid format for a message network instead of FTN and don't understand why ANYTHING is still run this way, but not my software. :)

In my experience, a QWK network is much easier to manage or join for everyone involved so long as their software supports it.
--
digital man (rob)

Sling Blade quote #23:
Karl: I reckon I'm gonna have to get used to looking at pretty people.
Norco, CA WX: 56.6øF, 39.0% humidity, 13 mph NNE wind, 0.00 inches rain/24hrs --- SBBSecho 3.20-Linux
* Origin: Vertrauen - [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net (1:103/705)

In my experience, a QWK network is much easier to manage or join for every involved so long as their software supports it.

But it also leaves it open for a abuse.

... Does a Kzin fear to follow where a Puppeteer leads?

--- Renegade v1.35à/DOS
* Origin: The Titantic BBS Telnet - ttb.rgbbs.info (1:129/305)

Re: Re: RA to SBBS QWK Networking?
By: T.J. Mcmillen to Rob Swindell on Sat Mar 16 2024 06:47 am

In my experience, a QWK network is much easier to manage or join for every involved so long as their software supports it.

But it also leaves it open for a abuse.

That's up to the network operator how "open" their QWK network is or is not. DOVE-Net is very damn open and the few abuse cases over the years have been easy to deal with pretty quickly. And abusers tend to get bored and move on to other things. It's not really an issue.
--
digital man (rob)

Sling Blade quote #1:
Karl: I've killed Doyle with a lawn mower blade. Yes, I'm right sure of it. Norco, CA WX: 61.4øF, 55.0% humidity, 1 mph W wind, 0.15 inches rain/24hrs
--- SBBSecho 3.20-Linux
* Origin: Vertrauen - [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net (1:103/705)