(If you're not woke, you'll be punished.)

From: https://tinyurl.com/3v6mp98p (cbsnews.com)

===
Massachusetts foster parents lose license after refusing to sign gender
affirming policy: "We simply can't agree to go against our Christian faith"

Byv Louisa Moller
Louisa Moller is a general assignment reporter for WBZ-TV.

Updated on: October 10, 2025 / 1:46 PM EDT / CBS Boston

A couple from Woburn, Massachusetts has lost their license to foster
children after they refused to sign a gender affirming policy form from
the Department of Children and Families (DCF).

Lydia and Heath Marvin have three kids in their teens, but they have
fostered eight different children under the age of 4 since 2020. Their
most recent foster child was a baby with complex medical needs who stayed
with them for 15 months.

"Our Christian faith, it really drives us toward that. James says that
true undefiled religion is to care for the fatherless," said Heath.

The couple said they were prepared to care for more foster children until
DCF pulled their license to foster in April.

Foster parents cite religious beliefs

That's because the Marvins refused to sign the agency's LGBTQIA+
Non-Discrimination Policy because of their Christian faith. Starting in
2022, the policy said that foster families must affirm the LGBTQIA+
identity of foster children.

"We asked, is there any sort of accommodation, can you waive this at all?
We will absolutely love and support and care for any child in our home but
we simply can't agree to go against our Christian faith in this area. And,
were ultimately told you must sign the form as is or you will be
delicensed," Lydia said.

The Marvins appealed the loss of their license, but lost. They're
considering their options but two other Christian foster families are
plaintiffs in a federal lawsuit filed by the Massachusetts Family
Institute and Alliance Defending Freedom against DCF.

The lawsuit alleges the policy forces parents to "accept[ ] a child's
assertion of their LGBTQIA+ identity", "address[ ] children by their names
and pronouns," and "support[ ] gender-neutral practices regarding clothes
and physical appearance."

"There is a speech component and also a religious liberty component to the
lawsuit," said Sam Whiting, an attorney with the Massachusetts Family
Institute.

Letter from Trump administration

Last week, the Trump administration sent a letter to DCF, addressing the
lawsuit and specifically mentioning the Marvins.

"These policies and developments are deeply troubling, clearly contrary to
the purpose of child welfare programs, and in direct violation of First
Amendment protections," wrote Andrew Gradison, Acting Assistant Secretary
for the Administration for Children and Families.

LGBTQ+ advocates argue the policy was developed to protect kids.
Massachusetts foster parents also receive a monthly stipend.

"The state has an obligation to children to make sure that they're safe
and well protected. And foster parents, they're not parents. Foster
parents are temporary. They're a stop gap to make sure children can safely
go back to their families of origin," said Polly Crozier, Director of
Family Advocacy at GLBTQ Legal Advocates and Defenders.

Data collection by DCF is poor but a report by the Massachusetts
Commission on LGBTQ youth suggests that roughly 30 percent of foster
children in the state could identify as LGBTQ, similar to data collected
in California and New York.

The Marvins argue that DCF has been flexible about child placements in the
past for a number of reasons.

"We would love and care and support any child but if there was an issue
where we knew that we would have a different position than DCF, we would
just be open and talk to them about it," Heath said.

A DCF spokesperson said in a statement to WBZ-TV, "The Department does not
comment on matters related to pending litigation."
===

-- Sean

--- Maximus/2 3.01
* Origin: Micronet World HQ - bbs.outpostbbs.net:10323 (618:618/1)

Re: Normal foster parents punished by libtard gov't
By: Sean Dennis to All on Sun Oct 12 2025 06:32 pm

===
Massachusetts foster parents lose license after refusing to sign gender
affirming policy: "We simply can't agree to go against our Christian faith"

It sounds fine to me.

Adoption/fostering tend to lack volunteers and orphanages are always overloaded. If orphanages or adoption agencies want to discard potential volunteers willing to adopt or help out because of bullshit reasons, then let them.


--
gopher://gopher.richardfalken.com/1/richardfalken
--- SBBSecho 3.29-Linux
* Origin: Palantir * palantirbbs.ddns.net * Pensacola, FL * (618:250/24)

orphanages are always overloaded. If orphanages or
adoption agencies want to discard potential volunteers
willing to adopt or help out because of bullshit
reasons, then let them.

And it's attitudes like that is why people refuse to foster or adopt and the system is overloaded.

-- Sean

--- Maximus/2 3.01
* Origin: Micronet World HQ - bbs.outpostbbs.net:10323 (618:618/1)

The lawsuit alleges the policy forces parents to "accept[ ] a child's
assertion of their LGBTQIA+ identity", "address[ ] children by their names
and pronouns," and "support[ ] gender-neutral practices regarding clothes
and physical appearance."

What concerns me is that most kids young enough to be in foster care are
also too young to be concerned with gender identity and sexual orientation.
OTOH, they are at the age where they are impressionable and giving them
reason to consider things they are too young to comprehend could be quite harmful.

Mike

* SLMR 2.1a * Procrastination Day Has Been Postponed!
--- SBBSecho 3.28-Linux
* Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (618:250/1)

Massachusetts foster parents lose license after refusing to sign gender
affirming policy: "We simply can't agree to go against our Christian faith"

It sounds fine to me.

Adoption/fostering tend to lack volunteers and orphanages are always overloaded. If orphanages or adoption agencies want to discard potential volunteers willing to adopt or help out because of bullshit reasons, then let them.

In this case, it doesn't sound like the orphanages or adoption agencies are
the ones who want to discard them, but instead it is the state government agency that regulate them. It doesn't sound like the orphanages or
agencies, who will more likely feel the affects, necessarily have any say
in the matter.


* SLMR 2.1a * Uncontained entropy experiment gone crazy.......maybe.
--- SBBSecho 3.28-Linux
* Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (618:250/1)

Re: Normal foster parents pun
By: Mike Powell to ARELOR on Mon Oct 13 2025 09:40 am

In this case, it doesn't sound like the orphanages or adoption agencies are the ones who want to discard them, but instead it is the state government agency that regulate them. It doesn't sound like the orphanages or
agencies, who will more likely feel the affects, necessarily have any say
in the matter.

I think there might be a cultural barrier here at work. In Spain orphanages and adoption agencies are the administration.


--
gopher://gopher.richardfalken.com/1/richardfalken
--- SBBSecho 3.29-Linux
* Origin: Palantir * palantirbbs.ddns.net * Pensacola, FL * (618:250/24)

In this case, it doesn't sound like the orphanages or adoption agencies are the ones who want to discard them, but instead it is the state government agency that regulate them. It doesn't sound like the orphanages or agencies, who will more likely feel the affects, necessarily have any say in the matter.

I think there might be a cultural barrier here at work. In Spain orphanages an
adoption agencies are the administration.

Ahhh, yes, that is a difference vs. the US (at least, the parts of it I am familiar with).


* SLMR 2.1a * IBM = Institute of Black Magic
--- SBBSecho 3.28-Linux
* Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (618:250/1)