https://gitlab.synchro.net/main/sbbs/-/issues/343#note_7394

Hi all! I still have too many call out's from binkit for downlinks nodes.
I know that is not problem.. But they are wasting meaningless resources, including filling up the binkit log with noise that these nodes would never connect to.
binkit should never call nodes that are not marked for polling
--- SBBSecho 3.28-Linux
* Origin: Vertrauen - [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net (1:103/705)

Fernando Toledo wrote to GitLab note in main/sbbs <=-

https://gitlab.synchro.net/main/sbbs/-/issues/343#note_7394

Hi all! I still have too many call out's from binkit for downlinks
nodes. I know that is not problem.. But they are wasting meaningless resources, including filling up the binkit log with noise that these
nodes would never connect to. binkit should never call nodes that are
not marked for polling

It's not so much a binkit issue as it is a tickit issue... I read your
issue at the link above and can also confirm that this is still
happening. In fact you can have a downlink on "Pause" (their connected
link section has "Passive = true" in it), and Tickit will still create
.dlo files to send them the file referenced in an incoming .TIC.

There are a couple of other bugs/feature requests pending for Tickit
also... Hopefully some attention soon! :-)



... I was wondering why the baseball was getting bigger. Then it hit me.
--- MultiMail/Linux v0.52
þ Synchronet þ Palantir BBS * palantirbbs.ddns.net * Pensacola, FL
* Origin: Vertrauen - [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net (1:103/705)