Are you certain you are dealing with Fidonet ?
Not sure I understand what you are asking?
Two entries in different nets by the same system should not occur in Fidonet.
Yes? No?
If you're talking about 'othernets' then it isn't Fidonet.
Its another correlation put that two systems (in two different
nets) are the same system.
Its another correlation put that two systems (in two different
nets) are the same system.
I am still not seeing why this is needed or even of any real consequence if indeed 'two different nets' are not both fidonet nodes. Also what does anything to do with BBSing have to do with this if indeed most node addresses haven't been running BBSes since about the mid 90's or so.
Is it "needed", no, I dont think it is.
Is it "useful", I do.
Does it break anything, not that I'm aware of.
Sorry, I dont understand the second part of your question.
Is it "needed", no, I dont think it is.
Then why all the bother?
Does it break anything, not that I'm aware of.
It doesn't break anything here other than to further pollute the MSG format with utter nonsense.
I thought that was clear - Rob is using it to achieve a purpose
I understand your viewpoint though.
| Sysop: | Sarah |
|---|---|
| Location: | Portland, Oregon |
| Users: | 304 |
| Nodes: | 16 (0 / 16) |
| Uptime: | 31:12:46 |
| Calls: | 2,098 |
| Calls today: | 2,098 |
| Files: | 85,276 |
| U/L today: |
554 files (10,683M bytes) |
| D/L today: |
161,184 files (55,555M bytes) |
| Messages: | 82,408 |
| Posted today: | 83 |